Comments on: It’s a 4-peat for The Atomic Bitchwax http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/2009/04/29/bitchwaxreview/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:51:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: H.P. Taskmaster http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/2009/04/29/bitchwaxreview/comment-page-1/#comment-143 H.P. Taskmaster Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:02:52 +0000 http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/?p=1629#comment-143 Revival is actually the name of the first Core record, but there wasn't a title track. Good connection though, I hadn't thought of that. Revival is actually the name of the first Core record, but there wasn’t a title track. Good connection though, I hadn’t thought of that.

]]> By: Bermuda Jay http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/2009/04/29/bitchwaxreview/comment-page-1/#comment-142 Bermuda Jay Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:52:50 +0000 http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/?p=1629#comment-142 Isn't Revival a Core song from like 1996? Isn’t Revival a Core song from like 1996?

]]> By: Ricky http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/2009/04/29/bitchwaxreview/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Ricky Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:03:29 +0000 http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/?p=1629#comment-139 Hi, whatsup, You sound like you spilled some Black Nasa in your Bitchwax. the real larger issue is where 4 stands in the Kozik discog; he is bigger than TAB alone.. Hi, whatsup, You sound like you spilled some Black Nasa in your Bitchwax.

the real larger issue is where 4 stands in the Kozik discog; he is bigger than TAB alone..

]]> By: Buried Treasure: The Tilburg Haul | The Obelisk http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/2009/04/29/bitchwaxreview/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Buried Treasure: The Tilburg Haul | The Obelisk Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:37:30 +0000 http://theobelisk.net/obelisk/?p=1629#comment-136 [...] « It’s a 4-peat for The Atomic Bitchwax [...] [...] « It’s a 4-peat for The Atomic Bitchwax [...]

]]>